[1805] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Hank Nussbacher)
Fri Feb 2 02:43:03 1996
Date: Fri, 02 Feb 96 08:10:28 IST
From: Hank Nussbacher <HANK@taunivm.tau.ac.il>
To: G.Huston@aarnet.edu.au, jon@branch.com
cc: bmanning@isi.edu, curtis@ans.net, jnc@ginger.lcs.mit.edu, asp@uunet.uu.net,
cidrd@iepg.org, iesg@isi.edu, local-ir@ripe.net, nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: Message of Fri, 2 Feb 1996 14:16:18 +1100 (EST) from
<G.Huston@aarnet.edu.au>
On Fri, 2 Feb 1996 14:16:18 +1100 (EST) you said:
>>
>> > We are working on the 192.x.x.x swamp right now.
>> > Rough estimates (with much more accurate data @ NANOG)
>> >
>> > 60% - invalid or missing contact information
>>
>> This is interesting. How about a policy that says if nobody can contact you
>> and none of your addresses are reachable, then after some period, your
>> addresses get recycled.
>
>How about a policy which says that if you fail to pay an annual amount
>by a due date then a process is commenced with an outcome such that
>your registration details expire and the associated number space is no
>longer registered to you.
and how about a waive of the fee if you return smaller
aggregates for a larger one (I started doing something similiar in
Israel 3 months ago).
>
>Geoff
>
Hank
