[1804] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Curtis Villamizar)
Fri Feb 2 00:42:55 1996
To: George Herbert <gherbert@crl.com>
cc: Scott Huddle <huddle@ns.mci.net>, cidrd@iepg.org, local-ir@ripe.net,
nanog@merit.edu
Reply-To: curtis@ans.net
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 01 Feb 1996 15:09:59 PST."
<199602012310.AA15971@mail.crl.com>
Date: Fri, 02 Feb 1996 00:35:54 -0500
From: Curtis Villamizar <curtis@ans.net>
In message <199602012310.AA15971@mail.crl.com>, George Herbert writes:
>
> >> Backbone, Scott. Backbone. You, Sprint, PSI, Alternet,
> >> Net-99, etc. All the rest of the world's providers are getting
> >> transit from some backbone. If all the transit backbones are in the
> >> area the problem is merely political.
> >
> >They aren't... ICM, Pipex, and Dante to name three. Sprintlink
> >may play nice and handle ICM, what do you plan to do to address the
> >others?
>
> How do Pipex and Dante get global routes right now?
Oh.. from a whole bunch of different places.
ANS customer routes from ANS
MCI customer routes from MCI
SprintLink customer routes from Sprint
Alternet customer routes from Alternet
AUNET routes from EUNET
...
You get the idea.
And each of these I'm sure has routes all over the 192/8 space.
Curtis
