[179351] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Multi-gigabit edge devices as CPE
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Josh Baird)
Thu Apr 9 10:56:13 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <DFC8057C-D609-465D-89E5-6AC93C4D413D@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2015 10:56:10 -0400
From: Josh Baird <joshbaird@gmail.com>
To: Tim Raphael <raphael.timothy@gmail.com>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
You could possibly look at rolling vMX (if it's even available yet) on x86
hardware. It's licensed by throughput and feature set. If you are doing
L3VPN, I think you would need the advanced license. This may fit within
your budget.
On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 10:50 AM, Tim Raphael <raphael.timothy@gmail.com>
wrote:
> You=E2=80=99ll be looking at a Juniper MX or a Cisco ASK9K I think.
>
> The MXs are targeted as being full-features edge routers. An MX5 will tak=
e
> a full feed just fine and do all the *VPN you want.
> If you=E2=80=99re talking about multiple full feeds then you=E2=80=99ll n=
eed a MX240 with
> one of the higher-power REs for a decent reconvergence time.
>
>
> > On 9 Apr 2015, at 10:42 pm, Daniel Rohan <drohan@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 7:25 AM, Tim Raphael <raphael.timothy@gmail.com
> <mailto:raphael.timothy@gmail.com>> wrote:
> > L3VPN hand off is the only thing I can think of from the top of my head=
.
> But then, there would be no need to have a full table unless you had
> customers requesting a full table.
> >
> >
> > I have one customer who needs an L3VPN for some shared private routes
> along with a full table in inet.0. There are ways of accomplishing this
> creatively but I'm looking for devices that can handle these types of
> requests that permit us some level of sanity.
>
>
