[179350] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Multi-gigabit edge devices as CPE
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Tim Raphael)
Thu Apr 9 10:51:02 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: Tim Raphael <raphael.timothy@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAJXc8RJ5pMB8Qx4pnVcsNG+V2c74R5Q-Z4PLCsqT48b0WAL9kA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2015 22:50:45 +0800
To: Daniel Rohan <drohan@gmail.com>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
You=E2=80=99ll be looking at a Juniper MX or a Cisco ASK9K I think.
The MXs are targeted as being full-features edge routers. An MX5 will =
take a full feed just fine and do all the *VPN you want.
If you=E2=80=99re talking about multiple full feeds then you=E2=80=99ll =
need a MX240 with one of the higher-power REs for a decent reconvergence =
time.
> On 9 Apr 2015, at 10:42 pm, Daniel Rohan <drohan@gmail.com> wrote:
>=20
>=20
> On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 7:25 AM, Tim Raphael <raphael.timothy@gmail.com =
<mailto:raphael.timothy@gmail.com>> wrote:
> L3VPN hand off is the only thing I can think of from the top of my =
head. But then, there would be no need to have a full table unless you =
had customers requesting a full table.
>=20
>=20
> I have one customer who needs an L3VPN for some shared private routes =
along with a full table in inet.0. There are ways of accomplishing this =
creatively but I'm looking for devices that can handle these types of =
requests that permit us some level of sanity.=20
