[179221] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: BGP offloading (fixing legacy router BGP scalability issues)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Colin Johnston)
Fri Apr 3 14:59:04 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <CAPz7E50vvv6FByWeQKRnv2t6o3gv54Sm1sRnah49wVeP7_66Qg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Colin Johnston <colinj@gt86car.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2015 19:58:49 +0100
To: Bacon Zombie <baconzombie@gmail.com>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
portscanning on mass scale where unable to get knowledgable network/sysadmin=
s to fix gets to the point of every part of large network ranges are affecte=
d. then country blocks make sense to protect countries from armies of exploi=
ted machines and protect valuable costly network resource
colin
Sent from my iPhone
> On 3 Apr 2015, at 19:22, Bacon Zombie <baconzombie@gmail.com> wrote:
>=20
> Is port scanning illegal in China?
>=20
> If not the there is no reason for then to do anything about it.
>> On 3 Apr 2015 19:00, "Barry Shein" <bzs@world.std.com> wrote:
>>=20
>>=20
>>> On April 2, 2015 at 14:19 goemon@anime.net (goemon@anime.net) wrote:
>>> a number of years back i did have someone contact in chinese and the
>>> response was that the customer was doing nothing wrong.
>>=20
>> Ok, that's progress of a sort, what's the authoritative source of
>> right and wrong, something beyond "c'mon it's obvious!"?
>>=20
>> --
>> -Barry Shein
>>=20
>> The World | bzs@TheWorld.com |
>> http://www.TheWorld.com
>> Purveyors to the Trade | Voice: 800-THE-WRLD | Dial-Up: US, PR,
>> Canada
>> Software Tool & Die | Public Access Internet | SINCE 1989 *oo*=
>>=20
