[179213] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: BGP offloading (fixing legacy router BGP scalability issues)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Colin Johnston)
Fri Apr 3 01:08:59 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2015 06:08:51 +0100
From: Colin Johnston <colinj@gt86car.org.uk>
In-Reply-To: <551CF2DD.6080805@seacom.mu>
To: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka@seacom.mu>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
customers are paying for good traffic to generate eye balls and revenue, not=
bad traffic which clouds the good work done.
I know we are getting into filtering traffic wars here but if the source adm=
ins refuse to respond, refuse to cooperate, then if 100% of the traffic is b=
ad then why not put up walls.
I would like country trade talks to get down to the technical point that the=
re are some fundamental problems being seen with bad traffic usage and it is=
significant percentage of waste bandwidth.
Colin
=20
> On 2 Apr 2015, at 08:42, Mark Tinka <mark.tinka@seacom.mu> wrote:
>=20
>=20
>=20
>> On 2/Apr/15 09:35, Colin Johnston wrote:
>> or ignore/block russia and north korea and china network blocks
>> takes away 5% of network ranges for memory headroom, especially the large=
number of smaller china blocks.
>> Some may say this is harsh but is the network contacts refuse to co-opera=
te with abuse and 100% of the traffic is bad then why not
>=20
> I think that's a little extreme, especially since customers are paying
> me to deliver packets to the whole Internet.
>=20
> But that's just me...
>=20
> Mark.
