[179209] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: BGP offloading (fixing legacy router BGP scalability issues)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Bryan Holloway)
Thu Apr 2 20:10:28 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: Bryan Holloway <bholloway@pavlovmedia.com>
To: Barry Shein <bzs@world.std.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2015 20:11:43 +0000
In-Reply-To: <21789.40332.276582.854995@world.std.com>
Cc: "goemon@anime.net" <goemon@anime.net>, "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
I, for one, wouldn't mind seeing more dialog regarding the original poster'=
s query ...
> On Apr 2, 2015, at 14:53, Barry Shein <bzs@world.std.com> wrote:
>=20
>=20
> The essence of this discussion is IMHO a little...um...trite.
>=20
> Be that as it may how many of you have attempted to contact these
> providers in Chinese?
>=20
> Or do you all have good reason to believe that is never the problem?
>=20
>=20
>> On April 2, 2015 at 11:05 goemon@anime.net (goemon@anime.net) wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2 Apr 2015, Mark Tinka wrote:
>>> Most of the spam I get comes from North America. Go figure. I'm not
>>> about to cut access to that continent off.
>>=20
>> Big difference is that north america is usually responsive to abuse=20
>> notifications and sometimes has LEO who will listen.
>>=20
>> china is neither.
>>=20
>> -Dan
>=20
> --=20
> -Barry Shein
>=20
> The World | bzs@TheWorld.com | http://www.TheWorld=
.com
> Purveyors to the Trade | Voice: 800-THE-WRLD | Dial-Up: US, PR, Ca=
nada
> Software Tool & Die | Public Access Internet | SINCE 1989 *oo*
