[179201] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: BGP offloading (fixing legacy router BGP scalability issues)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Barry Shein)
Thu Apr 2 15:51:11 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: Barry Shein <bzs@world.std.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2015 15:50:36 -0400
To: goemon@anime.net
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1504021103410.19628@sasami.anime.net>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
The essence of this discussion is IMHO a little...um...trite.
Be that as it may how many of you have attempted to contact these
providers in Chinese?
Or do you all have good reason to believe that is never the problem?
On April 2, 2015 at 11:05 goemon@anime.net (goemon@anime.net) wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Apr 2015, Mark Tinka wrote:
> > Most of the spam I get comes from North America. Go figure. I'm not
> > about to cut access to that continent off.
>
> Big difference is that north america is usually responsive to abuse
> notifications and sometimes has LEO who will listen.
>
> china is neither.
>
> -Dan
--
-Barry Shein
The World | bzs@TheWorld.com | http://www.TheWorld.com
Purveyors to the Trade | Voice: 800-THE-WRLD | Dial-Up: US, PR, Canada
Software Tool & Die | Public Access Internet | SINCE 1989 *oo*
