[178930] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: BCOP appeals numbering scheme -- feedback requested
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (William Norton)
Sat Mar 14 15:19:18 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: William Norton <wbn@drpeering.net>
In-Reply-To: <6B1848C6-1AB3-4A1B-824C-D0C66810406C@delong.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2015 12:19:09 -0700
To: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
Cc: "bcop-support@nanog.org" <bcop-support@nanog.org>,
"nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
> On Mar 13, 2015, at 5:54 PM, Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com> wrote:
>=20
> It does, but for BCOP, I do think it would be best if the new document =
completely obsoleted the previous document and still relevant content =
was copied into the new document rather than leaving merge as an =
exercise.
Agreed - Hence the =E2=80=9CCurrent=E2=80=9D in the title. Maybe the =
date of the document will be the key to let people know that they have =
the most current version.
>=20
> Owen
