[178943] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: BCOP appeals numbering scheme -- feedback requested
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Sun Mar 15 19:44:15 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
To: Andrew Sullivan <asullivan@dyn.com>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 15 Mar 2015 19:14:05 -0400."
<20150315231404.GB2496@dyn.com>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2015 19:44:01 -0400
Cc: "bcop-support@nanog.org" <bcop-support@nanog.org>,
"nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
--==_Exmh_1426463041_2127P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Sun, 15 Mar 2015 19:14:05 -0400, Andrew Sullivan said:
> I also think that trying to pack more bits of information into the
> numbering system is a mistake. But then, I would. I think you look
> those sorts of things up (in the DNS, of course ;-) )
DANE? :)
--==_Exmh_1426463041_2127P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001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=1Kvj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1426463041_2127P--
