[178533] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: content regulation, was Verizon Policy Statement on Net Neutrality
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Rich Kulawiec)
Sat Feb 28 09:53:40 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2015 09:53:37 -0500
From: Rich Kulawiec <rsk@gsp.org>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <CAC+VsLvwHmWWQVOdhWmiAe-6UiXv3LDKeFgXO+h+iprDowpr8A@mail.gmail.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 02:48:07PM +0900, Collin Anderson wrote:
> How would this legal environment be any different than the pre-Verizon
> network neutrality rules for network management of SPAM?
SPAM, being a product of the Hormel Corporation, is not a concern in
this context. Spam, the slang term for unsolicited bulk email (UBE),
is a form of denial-of-service attack and may/should be treated in
the same way as other DoS attacks.
---rsk
