[178485] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Verizon Policy Statement on Net Neutrality
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (=?utf-8?B?TcOlbnM=?= Nilsson)
Fri Feb 27 18:22:00 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2015 00:09:44 +0100
From: =?utf-8?B?TcOlbnM=?= Nilsson <mansaxel@besserwisser.org>
To: Jack Bates <jbates@paradoxnetworks.net>
In-Reply-To: <54F0CA30.7080706@paradoxnetworks.net>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
--3MwIy2ne0vdjdPXF
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: Verizon Policy Statement on Net Neutrality Date: Fri, Feb 27, =
2015 at 01:49:04PM -0600 Quoting Jack Bates (jbates@paradoxnetworks.net):
<snip>=20
> Ideally, I suspect that most people would prefer a more
> variable approach, allowing for the complete frequency spectrum for
> upload and download and any combination in between.
=20
What people want, at least once thay have tasted it, is optical last
mile. And not that PON shit. The real stuff or bust.
> Let's be honest, it would be nice to utilize wasted download
> frequency to send something quicker.=20
Any access technology with less than 1Gbit symmetrical bandwidth is
20th century. Doing greenfield with that is plainly stupid. There=20
is business to be made from smaller upgrades to copper that is in place,
but as soon as you dig (or set new poles in the ground), fiber is the
only real alternative.
--=20
M=C3=A5ns Nilsson primary/secondary/besserwisser/machina
MN-1334-RIPE +46 705 989668
I like your SNOOPY POSTER!!
--3MwIy2ne0vdjdPXF
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAlTw+TYACgkQ02/pMZDM1cXKcQCglKSLan4xV4D4lJwxNBik1uOH
wvMAn2jPsPmT1LfPWg8rFqx+KqFLzg0p
=lx81
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--3MwIy2ne0vdjdPXF--
