[178172] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: OT - Small DNS "appliances" for remote offices.
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Bacon Zombie)
Wed Feb 18 19:20:25 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <54E52829.8090509@mulligan.org>
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 01:20:21 +0100
From: Bacon Zombie <baconzombie@gmail.com>
To: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
You also have to watch out for issues with the Pi corrupting SD cards.
On 19 Feb 2015 01:04, "Geoff Mulligan" <nanog08@mulligan.org> wrote:
> I have used the BeagleBone to run a few simple servers. I don't know if
> the ethernet port on the Bone is on the USB bus. It is slightly more
> expensive than a PI, but they have worked well for me.
>
> Geoff
>
> On 02/18/2015 04:44 PM, Peter Loron wrote:
>
>> For any site where you would use a Pi as the DNS cache, it won't be an
>> issue. DNS isn't that heavy at those query rates.
>>
>> Yeah, it would be awesome if they'd been able to get a SoC that included
>> ethernet.
>>
>> -Pete
>>
>> On 2015-02-18 15:08, Robert Webb wrote:
>>
>>> What I do not like about the Pi is the network port is on the USB bus
>>> and thus limited to USB speeds.
>>>
>>> <div>-------- Original message --------</div><div>From: Maxwell Cole
>>> <mcole.mailinglists@gmail.com> </div><div>Date:02/18/2015 4:30 PM
>>> (GMT-05:00) </div><div>To: "nanog@nanog.org >> 'NANOG list'"
>>> <nanog@nanog.org> </div><div>Subject: Re: OT - Small DNS "appliances"
>>> for remote offices. </div><div>
>>> </div>
>>>
>>
>
