[178171] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: OT - Small DNS "appliances" for remote offices.
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Geoff Mulligan)
Wed Feb 18 19:02:52 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 17:02:49 -0700
From: Geoff Mulligan <nanog08@mulligan.org>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <86e4922f5c8ff3b961a7e3859b1bf43b@standingwave.org>
Reply-To: geoff@proto6.com
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
I have used the BeagleBone to run a few simple servers. I don't know if
the ethernet port on the Bone is on the USB bus. It is slightly more
expensive than a PI, but they have worked well for me.
Geoff
On 02/18/2015 04:44 PM, Peter Loron wrote:
> For any site where you would use a Pi as the DNS cache, it won't be an
> issue. DNS isn't that heavy at those query rates.
>
> Yeah, it would be awesome if they'd been able to get a SoC that
> included ethernet.
>
> -Pete
>
> On 2015-02-18 15:08, Robert Webb wrote:
>> What I do not like about the Pi is the network port is on the USB bus
>> and thus limited to USB speeds.
>>
>> <div>-------- Original message --------</div><div>From: Maxwell Cole
>> <mcole.mailinglists@gmail.com> </div><div>Date:02/18/2015 4:30 PM
>> (GMT-05:00) </div><div>To: "nanog@nanog.org >> 'NANOG list'"
>> <nanog@nanog.org> </div><div>Subject: Re: OT - Small DNS "appliances"
>> for remote offices. </div><div>
>> </div>
