[177832] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

RE: Re: Checkpoint IPS

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Darden, Patrick)
Fri Feb 6 11:23:29 2015

X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: "Darden, Patrick" <Patrick.Darden@p66.com>
To: Roland Dobbins <rdobbins@arbor.net>, "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2015 16:23:09 +0000
In-Reply-To: <15AB2602-8A05-43E8-A139-2831851EE6DD@arbor.net>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org

And when  your opinion is an acknowledged universal constant, I will tip my=
 hat to you.  In the meantime, your argument is extremely soundbitey--sound=
s great, but stupid.

--p

-----Original Message-----
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Roland Dobbins
Sent: Friday, February 06, 2015 10:09 AM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: [EXTERNAL]Re: Checkpoint IPS


On 6 Feb 2015, at 21:27, Darden, Patrick wrote:

> I understand the whole argument against state, and dismiss it.

One can 'dismiss' the speed of light in a vacuum or the Planck constant, bu=
t that doesn't exempt one from their constraints.

-----------------------------------
Roland Dobbins <rdobbins@arbor.net>

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post