[177626] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Recommended wireless AP for 400 users office
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mike Hammett)
Thu Jan 29 08:23:01 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 07:22:48 -0600 (CST)
From: Mike Hammett <nanog@ics-il.net>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <CAD0TWZ8j_3V3ZowprK7z-_Kx=uDLED=J4ksSduqg3vxEpLOVsQ@mail.gmail.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
What problems have you had with UBNT?=20
It's zero hand-off doesn't work on unsecured networks, but that's about the=
extent of the issues I've heard of other than stadium density environments=
.=20
-----=20
Mike Hammett=20
Intelligent Computing Solutions=20
http://www.ics-il.com=20
----- Original Message -----
From: "Manuel Mar=C3=ADn" <mmg@transtelco.net>=20
To: nanog@nanog.org=20
Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2015 11:06:39 PM=20
Subject: Recommended wireless AP for 400 users office=20
Dear nanog community=20
I was wondering if you can recommend or share your experience with APs that=
=20
you can use in locations that have 300-500 users. I friend recommended me=
=20
Ruckus Wireless, it would be great if you can share your experience with=20
Ruckus or with a similar vendor. My experience with ubiquity for this type=
=20
of requirement was not that good.=20
Thank you and have a great day=20
