[176660] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Followup: Survey results for the ARIN RPA
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Rubens Kuhl)
Mon Dec 8 13:14:01 2014
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <CDC7F8D5-5EF4-4ABE-84FB-76798E5480BA@arin.net>
Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2014 16:13:52 -0200
From: Rubens Kuhl <rubensk@gmail.com>
To: John Curran <jcurran@arin.net>
Cc: North American Network Operators' Group <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
>
>
> One could easily presume the ARIN region RPKI deployment statistics are
> lower as a result of the RPA situation (and no doubt that it part of the
> issue), but as noted earlier, it's unlikely to be the full story since
> we also have a region (APNIC) where RPKI deployment also rather low that
> and yet does not have these RPA legal entanglements.
>
> It was suggested earlier that this may be due to a combination of factors
> (education, promotion) beyond the RPA legal issues that are now being
> worked - so that will also need to be addressed once the RPA is resolved.
>
Are the US litigation risks that much higher than other jurisdictions so
that ARIN needs to take a different approach than other RIRs ? If they are,
perhaps a confederation design instead of centralized one would help
scatter those risks ?
Rubens
