[176561] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: ARIN's RPKI Relying agreement
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (John Curran)
Thu Dec 4 12:53:15 2014
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: John Curran <jcurran@arin.net>
To: Wes George <wesley.george@twcable.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2014 17:53:02 +0000
In-Reply-To: <D0A5F08E.3AE6C%wesley.george@twcable.com>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On Dec 4, 2014, at 12:32 PM, George, Wes <wesley.george@twcable.com> wrote:
> Those are operational matters, implemented by the staff, governed by the
> board, who is informed by their legal council and staff. That is part of
> the reason why I brought some of the issues to the NANOG community, since
> interaction with ARIN board members and staff is what's necessary to make
> sure the concerns are addressed, and thus it benefits from wider
> discussion.
Wes -=20
=20
I am happy to champion the change that you seek (i.e. will get it reviewe=
d=20
by legal and brought before the ARIN Board) but still need clarity on wha=
t=20
change you wish to occur -
A) Implicit binding to the indemnification/warrant disclaimer clauses
(as done by the other RIRs)
B) Removal of the indemnification & warranty disclaimer clause=20
I asked this directly during your NANOG presentation, but you did not res=
pond=20
either way. I also noted that your own business customer agreements have=
the=20
same indemnification & non-warranty clauses (as they are common in nearly=
all
telecommunication and ISP service agreements) - are these now being dropp=
ed
by TWC in agreements?
Thanks!
/John
John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN