[176019] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Equinix Virginia - Ethernet OOB suggestions
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Paul S.)
Tue Nov 11 00:24:37 2014
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 23:06:49 +0900
From: "Paul S." <contact@winterei.se>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <CANdN9jZq84+bkKrWimRAde-Y+0j1m6-uQZom9QmfE0akt4Rjhg@mail.gmail.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
I'd be doubtful if anyone will feel like offering a /23 with OOB as
justification these days, sadly.
Good luck nonetheless.
On 11/10/2014 午後 11:00, Ruairi Carroll wrote:
> Hey,
>
> VPN setup is not really a viable option (for us) in this scenario.
> Honestly, I'd prefer to just call it done already and have a VPN but due to
> certain restraints, we have to go down this route.
>
> /Ruairi
>
> On 10 November 2014 14:38, Alistair Mackenzie <magicsata@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Couldn't you put a router or VPN system on the single IP they are giving
>> you and use RFC1918 addressing space?
>>
>> OOB doesn't normally justify a /24 let alone a /23.
>>
>> On 10 November 2014 13:18, Ruairi Carroll <ruairi.carroll@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Dear List,
>>>
>>> I've got an upcoming deployment in Equinix (DC10) and I'm struggling to
>>> find a provider who can give me a 100Mbit port (With a commit of about
>>> 5-10Mbit) with a /23 or /24 of public space , for OOB purposes. We had
>>> hoped to use Equinixs services, however they're limiting us to a single
>>> public IP.
>>>
>>> I'm also open to other solutions - xDSL or similar, but emphasis is on
>>> cheap and on-net.
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>> /Ruairi
>>>
>>
