[176016] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Equinix Virginia - Ethernet OOB suggestions
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Ruairi Carroll)
Tue Nov 11 00:19:38 2014
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <CA+bbMksWp2RD5MSyA6=E9EbF1ssDNNHAsQnuOSuPQ1=gURz6sw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 15:00:53 +0100
From: Ruairi Carroll <ruairi.carroll@gmail.com>
To: Alistair Mackenzie <magicsata@gmail.com>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
Hey,
VPN setup is not really a viable option (for us) in this scenario.
Honestly, I'd prefer to just call it done already and have a VPN but due to
certain restraints, we have to go down this route.
/Ruairi
On 10 November 2014 14:38, Alistair Mackenzie <magicsata@gmail.com> wrote:
> Couldn't you put a router or VPN system on the single IP they are giving
> you and use RFC1918 addressing space?
>
> OOB doesn't normally justify a /24 let alone a /23.
>
> On 10 November 2014 13:18, Ruairi Carroll <ruairi.carroll@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Dear List,
>>
>> I've got an upcoming deployment in Equinix (DC10) and I'm struggling to
>> find a provider who can give me a 100Mbit port (With a commit of about
>> 5-10Mbit) with a /23 or /24 of public space , for OOB purposes. We had
>> hoped to use Equinixs services, however they're limiting us to a single
>> public IP.
>>
>> I'm also open to other solutions - xDSL or similar, but emphasis is on
>> cheap and on-net.
>>
>> Cheers
>> /Ruairi
>>
>
>
