[175666] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: A translation (was Re: An update from the ICANN ISPCP meeting...)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (goemon@anime.net)
Mon Oct 27 17:06:21 2014
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 13:32:15 -0700 (PDT)
From: goemon@anime.net
To: Eric Brunner-Williams <brunner@nic-naa.net>
In-Reply-To: <544EA937.3050601@nic-naa.net>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On Mon, 27 Oct 2014, Eric Brunner-Williams wrote:
> On 10/27/14 10:12 AM, goemon@anime.net wrote:
>> If you can't be bothered to have correct contact info, your packets go into
>> the scavenger queue. Or get redirected to a webpage explaining why your
>> network is blocked until you correct it.
>>
>> Your customers will be the ones complaining to you.
> the (icann accredited) registrar which accepted {bogus|non-verified|accurate}
> registrant data at some point in time less than 10 years ago which is now
> {bogus|non-verified|accurate|aged-out} is likely to be providing dns for the
> domain in question, or the dns is likely to be provided by the registrant, so
> the "packets [DO NOT] go into the scavenger queue." NOR are they "redirected
> ..."
I should clarify I was thinking about whois on the IP blocks and/or ASN.
not dns for domain names.
if your network is spewing sewage, there should be some way to contact
you. if you are uninterested in being contacted, there's always RBLs I
guess.
-Dan
