[175640] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: ARIN / RIR Pragmatism (WAS: Re: RADB)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Randy Bush)
Sun Oct 26 22:58:15 2014
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 11:58:04 +0900
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: John Curran <jcurran@arin.net>
In-Reply-To: <B34853C1-9A1C-4B6A-B05F-694556F205EB@arin.net>
Cc: North American Network Operators' Group <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
> LACNIC numbers (as a percent) are quite good, but my question
> was why only RIPE has the very impressive total count of ROAs.
< conjecture follows >
of course one can never know. but i conject
o the are the largest registry actively promotin registration
o the ncc, particularly alex, tim, oleg, ... have put significant
effort into making it very easy to register
o they have a culture of cooperation and doing things well
> You can clearly point to ARIN's legal treatment of the risks involved,
> but that is not applicable in the APNIC case....
it is hard to register in apnic, ask folk who have tried. the most
active folk are under NIRs, who are only now working on deployment.
apnic is not really promoting it.
> You don't feel there's any correlation between RIPE's IRR approach and
> their RPKI success?
that's the cooperative culture bit, actually interested in the net
running well.
randy
