[175627] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: ARIN / RIR Pragmatism (WAS: Re: RADB)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Ca By)
Sat Oct 25 21:57:40 2014
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <m2mw8jsnru.wl%randy@psg.com>
Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2014 18:57:30 -0700
From: Ca By <cb.list6@gmail.com>
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Cc: North American Network Operators' Group <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 5:00 PM, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> wrote:
> you just happen to have the view from a third world country
> look at.
> http://archive.psg.com/141006.rpki-nanog.pdf slides 4 & 5
> or
> http://certification-stats.ripe.net/?type=roa-v4
>
> randy
>
I agree with Randy. RPKI is achievable today. Signing routes is a trivial
amount of effort, there is really no excuse to not do it. Even i did it.
Validation does take effort, but it is consistent with the level of effort
to deploy any new router feature.
CB
