[175453] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Linux: concerns over systemd adoption and Debian's decision to
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Israel G. Lugo)
Wed Oct 22 12:48:41 2014
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 17:46:22 +0100
From: "Israel G. Lugo" <israel.lugo@lugosys.com>
To: Jeffrey Ollie <jeff@ocjtech.us>,
Miles Fidelman <mfidelman@meetinghouse.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAD-DQxRg_2Fvr5vFGHjrXnTLy0+cgXLci=uC-YGHdXypJGk9TA@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 22-10-2014 17:30, Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
> Hardly. The discussion so far has been weighted very heavily on the
> side of Dana Carvey's "Grumpy Old Man"-style whining. "That's the way
> it was and we liked it!". The people that like systemd (like myself)
> have wisely learned that the people that hate systemd, hate it mostly
> because it's different from what came before and don't want to change.
> There's no way to argue rationally with that.
Not everyone "hates it". I for one would be very much interested in
listening to what you have to say about systemd, if you find it to be a
positive change. How is it better, and how you look at some of the
concerns raised in this thread. At least for me, a balancing opinion
would be welcome.
