[175365] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Why is .gov only for US government agencies?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Doug Barton)
Mon Oct 20 23:57:34 2014
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 20:54:42 -0700
From: Doug Barton <dougb@dougbarton.us>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <BDD10A31-FEA4-4096-AC60-18F7D8B0563E@pch.net>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
On 10/20/14 6:30 PM, Bill Woodcock wrote:
|
| On Oct 21, 2014, at 9:23 AM, Jared Mauch <jared@puck.nether.net>
| wrote:
|
|> Breaking tons of things is an interesting opinion of "why not”.
|
| Eh. Off the top of my head, I see two categories of breakage:
|
| 1) things that hard-code a list of “real” TLDs, and break when
| their expectations aren’t met, and
|
| 2) things that went ahead and trumped up their own non-canonical
| TLDs for their own purposes.
|
| Neither of those seem like practices worth defending, to me. Not
| worth going out of one’s way to break, either, but…
Agree 100%
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJURdkCAAoJEFzGhvEaGryESOoIALGQRCkydGcbtt8ETfkaSwrp
bigHmXH/ljEZVX2DpA2IthtXME7OEOMFlVsm9HAbWuCZaRAbVHlJPWVEaSuunrj7
jeQxir22mO3RX4Yil577u9k+/woa+5m9ymyuLHnSJHNSL7Lnqw4BKjUgPPEm66+r
9D6wACv+s49+MXtd0DDc0dHBcPvF5TyxzLwGMUSzRQCfdsilcB9WwZ5WBvjWdPz7
xAHlToVaYMZSJ1pkjeTm23/UU/re7PcNFaoeMIWkwewTX9GAnjkoacvxqm1ckEGz
3cdRtfzmCCauxY/inogkS0bB3XLMWvGjMWueh7IW/bcaCyzJQOkc9qJWSsOrAgo=
=HO3c
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
