[175391] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Why is .gov only for US government agencies?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (David Conrad)
Tue Oct 21 14:17:24 2014
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org>
In-Reply-To: <06C09C37-8FCE-41B4-8E93-84BCE9568EA5@tislabs.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 11:17:13 -0700
To: Sandra Murphy <sandy@tislabs.com>
Cc: North American Network Operators Group <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
--Apple-Mail=_D7831E52-032C-4538-8071-E27A03E5B255
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=us-ascii
On Oct 21, 2014, at 10:33 AM, Sandra Murphy <sandy@tislabs.com> wrote:
>> Folks outside of the US have issues with the US government having a =
role in the administration of the root, even if that role is to ensure =
ICANN does screw the pooch.
>=20
> I'm thinking there's a "not" missing here.=20
For the numerous people who have suggested similar, both publicly and =
privately: yes, I did accidentally leave out a teensy little word. I =
honestly wasn't making a comment about my current (perhaps until my boss =
reads the post) employer. Really. No, really.=20
That'll teach me to post pre-coffee.
Regards,
-drc
--Apple-Mail=_D7831E52-032C-4538-8071-E27A03E5B255
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: attachment;
filename=signature.asc
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature;
name=signature.asc
Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org
iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJURqMpAAoJENV6ebf0/4rXD7sH/RdDv/Ccnhap72tT5lD4n/HG
/wQpoV+UxGuWpnVHSYrYsqZujOxtGqRbzo1jzPDW+x32N1h3mDIZWeeRl2Lo+EHs
Pww+Iox3U0jNX4EsScg+M/GlCiGDLaUUAux9M+6zBWo27oHMF73JWRoOver+blxE
EiQqud+0R32IAEkCwWuFCNbl3CrWfExZ3zxAc+rXolA/vSFnecnygyEU2X3JCLtP
jWdbodNt49+8h3zJ78c4tBpnfEYeq7uYbUFgaNTJcGfVDytg9r6VQDhjFaVxFeTS
rvY/OpffRNZHi4Ckg+Crf8OhHB2qFPMk9LLKh/mKVn1xmzxJqquFUxtg9EfKmqk=
=dbqP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--Apple-Mail=_D7831E52-032C-4538-8071-E27A03E5B255--
