[175194] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Bounce action notifications - NANOG mailing list changes
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Suresh Ramasubramanian)
Fri Oct 10 12:18:34 2014
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <5438042C.30700@mtcc.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2014 21:48:26 +0530
From: Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.lists@gmail.com>
To: Michael Thomas <mike@mtcc.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
Call it triage. When a minuscule amount of mailing list traffic is weighed
against huge volumes of forged spam and phish...
On 10-Oct-2014 9:40 pm, "Michael Thomas" <mike@mtcc.com> wrote:
> On 10/10/2014 08:10 AM, Randy Bush wrote:
>
>> a better approach would be to recommend that mailing list participants
>>>>> who want to actually participate should utilize a mail service
>>>>> appropriate for the purpose.
>>>>>
>>>> support
>>>>
>>> to be fair, this means EITHER one which does not DMARC mark messages
>>> OR one which disrespects DMARC. Right?
>>>
>> to one which respects both mailing list subscribers and admins
>>
>>
>>
> What surprises me is that the dmarc crowd (nee ADSP) surely knows all
> about this as it's been
> known for going on 10 years that this is what would happen. isn't one of
> the wg chairs a Y!'er too?
>
> Mike
>
