[175192] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Bounce action notifications - NANOG mailing list changes
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Steve Atkins)
Fri Oct 10 11:31:37 2014
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: Steve Atkins <steve@blighty.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAL9jLaYSnQJOZz8VCCnNLezGRd3e9Hf3W=LLExsabwcKE+rn-Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2014 08:31:27 -0700
To: nanog list <nanog@nanog.org>
Cc: NANOG Admins <admins@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On Oct 10, 2014, at 8:05 AM, Christopher Morrow =
<morrowc.lists@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 10:54 AM, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> wrote:
>>> a better approach would be to recommend that mailing list =
participants
>>> who want to actually participate should utilize a mail service
>>> appropriate for the purpose.
>>=20
>> support
+1
>=20
> to be fair, this means EITHER one which does not DMARC mark messages
> OR one which disrespects DMARC. Right?
One which does not publish DMARC p=3Dreject.
If any recipient honors published DMARC records then every
participant using a domain that publishes DMARC p=3Dreject will
break things.
If your domain publishes p=3Dreject it should not have any users
that participate in mailing lists.
Cheers,
Steve=
