[173799] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: [j-nsp] Viability of EX4300 in a primarily l3 environment?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Paul S.)
Wed Aug 6 08:19:47 2014
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2014 21:15:01 +0900
From: "Paul S." <contact@winterei.se>
To: Vincent Bernat <bernat@luffy.cx>
In-Reply-To: <m3d2cd4xza.fsf@neo.luffy.cx>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On 8/6/2014 午後 09:13, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> ❦ 6 août 2014 20:54 +0900, "Paul S." <contact@winterei.se> :
>
>> Correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't OSPF require the AFL license
>> anyway to be 'legitly' ran?
> OSPF does not need a feature license on those models (it is needed on
> EX2200). AFL is needed for BGP, IS-IS and MPLS.
3300 too, apparently -- thanks for the correction.
