[173798] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: [j-nsp] Viability of EX4300 in a primarily l3 environment?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Vincent Bernat)
Wed Aug 6 08:15:50 2014
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: Vincent Bernat <bernat@luffy.cx>
To: "Paul S." <contact@winterei.se>
Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2014 14:13:45 +0200
In-Reply-To: <53E21770.9040205@winterei.se> (Paul S.'s message of "Wed, 06 Aug
2014 20:54:24 +0900")
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
=E2=9D=A6 6 ao=C3=BBt 2014 20:54 +0900, "Paul S." <contact@winterei.se>=
=C2=A0:
> Correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't OSPF require the AFL license
> anyway to be 'legitly' ran?
OSPF does not need a feature license on those models (it is needed on
EX2200). AFL is needed for BGP, IS-IS and MPLS.
--=20
Use statement labels that mean something.
- The Elements of Programming Style (Kernighan & Plauger)
