[173710] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Muni Fiber and Politics
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mark Tinka)
Fri Aug 1 01:41:03 2014
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka@seacom.mu>
To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2014 07:40:50 +0200
In-Reply-To: <20140731120128.GA24465@besserwisser.org>
Reply-To: mark.tinka@seacom.mu
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
--nextPart16960230.jegYLda13R
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Thursday, July 31, 2014 02:01:28 PM M=E5ns Nilsson wrote:
> It is better, both for the customer and the provider.
If the provider is able to deliver 1Gbps to every home=20
(either on copper or fibre) with little to no uplink=20
oversubscription (think 44x customer-facing Gig-E ports + 4x=20
10Gbps uplink ports), essentially, there is no limit to what=20
services a provider and its partners can offer to its=20
customers.
Mark.
--nextPart16960230.jegYLda13R
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux)
iQIcBAABAgAGBQJT2yhiAAoJEGcZuYTeKm+GHLEP/3vQduSg7iFA/lc9kH8Tbxz/
iu8spUPW3d+9QJ56mRfCB2dERdb6dr5XykO9cQScxYkcYmX71rHfq0Xst6qNac16
FU1skeJvQEplDeQ1IySv7nIHpo3lgrx/AJp2q9nS0+pr+yGfqZwYY2n60ybAkL44
5Ubz4V/3R2mnkSPRrORkcnw8WR69uPg7tzgR2Og4upxffzIcAqDYt+sSuB9dcv9A
YxJhKX0aMD+ZUDvxqy5M/cx4lykt63yBFI+JeKykbicA4ZtoveY8MvdHLXg1ednU
UfdlTbkqTt3pUCvMXjDdKM3LICVwudgckAGxyrHnlOoPBfVImyU3JcVw5wWa6rFM
yTaItX9N4/qal5QYTfLK7n/oX5bs/7Mkt5UoQ/zbNQKv87Ua+Mfn4OUD2XVsAEG4
OOh+Rf6UMO4nl80qPA1EOKPUkhTKChejS9UamjWK2ofXLERvYX9neyK/GVyLBjWc
uFS/RdPRFItNOSw7U25DYBsyNpBgERolU1CRfuqrG+MWdloLcrg//nHyTwDOgdFq
uNCuPgUlEsLSa/p5EFZC5TBOJeY4rnmcuO90rzm++vLGTt+jEd4VCLX7aPMzrCE/
pJl2PNYWT/XBzOkE/YAzpFnnDFADx/MHuc/jhYIveHBMV6ZSB5C4Ol1UaVZCeBVE
wcwxYf5kjnmQng8vkvae
=hqNX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--nextPart16960230.jegYLda13R--
