[173668] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Netflix To Cogent To World
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (randal k)
Wed Jul 30 15:04:38 2014
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <7243979.6896.1406126897011.JavaMail.root@benjamin.baylink.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 13:04:31 -0600
From: randal k <nanog@data102.com>
To: Jay Ashworth <jra@baylink.com>
Cc: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
We peer with Netflix directly on an exchange, and transit Level3, Cogent,
HE & TW.
In me experience, when our direct peer is down for whatever reason, Netflix
prefers Hurricane Electric no matter what - if the route is there, it takes
it - then Cogent, then Level3, then TW.
I agree that the Netflix team is responsive and easy to work with, and
again in my experience, their network team is extremely interested in
making things happen (despite what blogs & hearsay ...)
Randal
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 8:48 AM, Jay Ashworth <jra@baylink.com> wrote:
> While thinking about this double play over the weekend, a very interesting
> chain of thoughts occurred to me.
>
> If I were Netflix, why would I buy all my transit from Cogent[1], given
> Cogent's propensity for getting into peering fights with people *already*,
> even before *I* start sending them 1000:1 asymmetric outbound traffic?
>
> Presumably because they're offering me a helluva deal on the bandwidth.
>
> So why would Cogent offer Netflix a helluva deal?
>
> Perhaps because they were smart enough to see how popular NF would
> become...
> and thought it would make an excellent stalking horse in their own peering
> fights?
>
> Who's gonna depeer Cogent *now*?
>
> Cheers,
> -- jra
> [1] This is my understanding, though of course I'm not privy.
> --
> Jay R. Ashworth Baylink
> jra@baylink.com
> Designer The Things I Think RFC
> 2100
> Ashworth & Associates http://www.bcp38.info 2000 Land
> Rover DII
> St Petersburg FL USA BCP38: Ask For It By Name! +1 727 647
> 1274
>
