[173613] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Carrier Grade NAT
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Matt Palmer)
Tue Jul 29 16:08:52 2014
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 06:05:35 +1000
From: Matt Palmer <mpalmer@hezmatt.org>
To: nanog@nanog.org
Mail-Followup-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <A66E4E82-7CA6-438D-AFC3-4B0D6FD3D2B3@gizmopartners.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 11:42:31AM -0500, Chris Boyd wrote:
> On Jul 29, 2014, at 10:23 AM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
> > If law enforcement comes along without port numbers then you give them a
> > list of subscribers behind that IP at the time. Use port block
> > allocation and keep track of the blocks to reduce logging load.
>
> There's probably going to be some interesting legal fallout from that
> practice. As an ISP customer, I'd be furious to find out that my
> communications had been intercepted due to the bad behavior of another
> user.
Then you'll no doubt be happy to know that you're very, very unlikely to
ever find out.
- Matt
