[172729] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Feedback Requested: Routing Resilience Manifesto
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Suresh Ramasubramanian)
Thu Jul 3 04:31:33 2014
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <78C35D6C1A82D243B830523B4193CF5F75BB59678E@SBS1.blinker.local>
Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2014 14:01:25 +0530
From: Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.lists@gmail.com>
To: David Hofstee <david@mailplus.nl>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 1:00 PM, David Hofstee <david@mailplus.nl> wrote:
> About #3... I had a little discussion on abuse-wg@RIPE a while ago about keeping records up to date and relevant. See below.
>
> Nobody at RIPE cares much at the moment (to actually pick up this subject). Maybe they need a push with a TerexRH400.
You get a lot of network and DNS types and maybe 1% of them will be
concerned with the mechanics of abuse prevention - that's the other
group down the hall, and "they are not the internet police". Ah well
.. maybe that's better than hamfisted lanham act takedowns of whitehat
dynamic dns providers - but those are two extremes.
--srs
--
Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.lists@gmail.com)
