[172467] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Thu Jun 19 14:11:48 2014
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
To: Barry Shein <bzs@world.std.com>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 19 Jun 2014 13:51:06 -0400."
<21411.8970.191029.86423@world.std.com>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2014 13:57:12 -0400
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
--==_Exmh_1403200632_7016P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Thu, 19 Jun 2014 13:51:06 -0400, Barry Shein said:
> Really. You're really completely discounting ICANN in having any
> leadership or participative role in the IPv4/IPv6 transition?
Haven't seen any yet. Probably because you can't make money with IP addr=
esses
like you can with TLD's....
(Now where's my Nomex overalls? :)
--==_Exmh_1403200632_7016P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001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=jin5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1403200632_7016P--
