[172466] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Christopher Morrow)
Thu Jun 19 14:07:39 2014

X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <21411.8970.191029.86423@world.std.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2014 13:57:24 -0400
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>
To: Barry Shein <bzs@world.std.com>
Cc: nanog list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org

On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 1:51 PM, Barry Shein <bzs@world.std.com> wrote:
>
> Really. You're really completely discounting ICANN in having any
> leadership or participative role in the IPv4/IPv6 transition?
>

What leadership position have you seen them take ASIDE from marketing
(in the last 2-3 yrs, but most of that has been ISOC not ICANN
directly) in the last 5 yrs or so?

-chris

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post