[172270] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Getting pretty close to default IPv4 route maximum for
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Bjoern A. Zeeb)
Tue Jun 10 05:41:48 2014
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net>
In-Reply-To: <0b214a987b20192a26851c1409ed9575@jonesy.com.au>
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 09:41:31 +0000
To: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On 10 Jun 2014, at 05:48 , Andrew Jones <aj@jonesy.com.au> wrote:
> Even if the first numbers were correctly calculated, they don=92t =
allow for further deaggregation of already advertised prefixes, which =
shouldn't be underestimated as the commercial value of each address =
increases...
IPv4 addresses have little commercial value anymore and IPv6 is =
basically free. The only people who still haven=92t realised don=92t =
have enough money to spend on IPv4 to keep themselves alive for another =
decade.
=97=20
Bjoern A. Zeeb "Come on. Learn, goddamn it.", WarGames, 1983
