[172293] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Getting pretty close to default IPv4 route maximum for
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Massimiliano Stucchi)
Wed Jun 11 11:16:57 2014
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2014 17:14:50 +0200
From: Massimiliano Stucchi <stucchi-lists@glevia.com>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <B3B2EC48-3AFA-43C1-B7C2-7646CB58F3F4@lists.zabbadoz.net>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 10/06/14 12:28, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
> You mean it’s more likely people acquire/merge with other companies for IP space then go through transfer? https://www.arin.net/knowledge/statistics/
You have to consider that most likely there will be an increase in
de-aggregation due to:
- The RIRs allocating smaller and smaller address space to every member,
even smaller than a /24;
- The RIRs allocating from smaller, fragmented allocations received from
IANA. This means that it would also be possible - in theory - for
example, to receive an allocation for a /22, sparse in two,
non-contiguous, /23s (or a similar situation).
- The holders of large parts of address space monetizing via transfers,
thus fragmenting even more.
Ciao!
--
Max
