[172039] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPv6 at 50% for VZW (Re: NAT IP and Google)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Sholes, Joshua)
Thu May 22 09:19:58 2014
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: "Sholes, Joshua" <Joshua_Sholes@cable.comcast.com>
To: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>, Jared Mauch
<jared@puck.nether.net>
Date: Thu, 22 May 2014 13:19:20 +0000
In-Reply-To: <CAL9jLabXHTxJRciu-4kRW1hBfAx5VwqBwjNgUYBV430cQ9Gd=g@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
Don't even joke about that, I can't handle another decade of NAT.
--=20
Josh
On 5/22/14, 8:55 AM, "Christopher Morrow" <morrowc.lists@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 8:41 AM, Jared Mauch <jared@puck.nether.net>
>wrote:
>> I remind vendors when I talk to them, "IPv6 first, then IP
>>classic(tm)".
>
>Coke Classic managed to outlast NewCoke... pattern repeating?
