[172037] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPv6 at 50% for VZW (Re: NAT IP and Google)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jared Mauch)
Thu May 22 08:41:41 2014
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: Jared Mauch <jared@puck.nether.net>
In-Reply-To: <CFA35BDB.D23C8%jason_livingood@cable.comcast.com>
Date: Thu, 22 May 2014 08:41:45 -0400
To: "Livingood, Jason" <Jason_Livingood@cable.comcast.com>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On May 22, 2014, at 8:04 AM, Livingood, Jason =
<Jason_Livingood@cable.comcast.com> wrote:
> On 5/21/14, 9:38 PM, "Jared Mauch" <jared@puck.nether.net> wrote:
>=20
>> On May 21, 2014, at 7:17 PM, Ca By <cb.list6@gmail.com> wrote:
>>=20
>>> Verizon Wireless is at 50% ipv6 penetration
>>=20
>> I suspect this would go up significantly if Twitter and Instagram =
would
>> IPv6 enable their services. Same for pintarest.
>=20
> +1
> We naturally focus a lot on network enablement here, but IMO it is a =
great
> time to focus on more web-based services embracing IPv6 with another =
June
> 6 just around the corner. :-)
I'm waiting to see Akamai and Cachefly follow the lead of Cloudflare and =
make everything IPv6 by default. I remind vendors when I talk to them, =
"IPv6 first, then IP classic(tm)".=
