[171844] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Observations of an Internet Middleman (Level3)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Paul Ferguson)
Thu May 15 13:34:50 2014
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Thu, 15 May 2014 10:17:46 -0700
From: Paul Ferguson <fergdawgster@mykolab.com>
To: Ryan Brooks <ryan@hack.net>
In-Reply-To: <5374F40E.8010603@hack.net>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
On 5/15/2014 10:06 AM, Ryan Brooks wrote:
> It's a shame the use of 'fast lane' is ubiquitous in this argument.
> If the local distribution networks would like to actually build
> something fast, then this would be a different story.
Okay, then call it the "faster lane" or the "uncongested lane" or
something that actually reflects bias and preferential treatment. It's
a done deal now:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-switch/wp/2014/05/15/fcc-approves-plan-to-allow-for-paid-priority-on-internet
FYI,
- - ferg
- --
Paul Ferguson
VP Threat Intelligence, IID
PGP Public Key ID: 0x54DC85B2
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iF4EAREIAAYFAlN09roACgkQKJasdVTchbJPlgEAtBpp0TKNZcIdrDkVP75Tni7a
O9PvcnKZdaPNuNUpOb0A/RQ5hvrqPAu/QLSp8dPbcDSO5Zad8Z3JG67UfI6yaeJH
=DhnX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
