[171627] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: US patent 5473599
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Laszlo Hanyecz)
Thu May 8 00:20:26 2014
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: Laszlo Hanyecz <laszlo@heliacal.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAJvB4t=0_DZ4d=icbt3NOuHedG5+3T4b6nsmW6ZLj1-gbrGKxQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 8 May 2014 01:30:58 +0000
To: Blake Dunlap <ikiris@gmail.com>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
This CARP thing is the best troll I've seen yet. Over a decade old and =
people are still on about it.
-Laszlo
On May 8, 2014, at 1:15 AM, Blake Dunlap <ikiris@gmail.com> wrote:
> Except for that whole mac address thing, that crashes networks...
>=20
> -Blake
>=20
> On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 8:03 PM, Constantine A. Murenin
> <mureninc@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 7 May 2014 17:56, <Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu> wrote:
>>> On Wed, 07 May 2014 17:10:32 -0700, "Constantine A. Murenin" said:
>>>=20
>>>> Also, would you please be so kind as to finally explain to us why
>>>> Google can squat on the https port with SPDY,
>>>=20
>>> Because it doesn't squat on the port. It politely asks "Do you =
speak SPDY,
>>> or just https?" and then listens to what the other end replies.
>>=20
>> Same for CARP -- it has its own version number, so, there's no
>> conflict with the VRRP spec, either.
>>=20
>> C.
