[171402] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: What Net Neutrality should and should not cover
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Mon Apr 28 10:29:14 2014
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
To: TGLASSEY <tglassey@earthlink.net>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 28 Apr 2014 07:08:55 -0700."
<535E60F7.8080906@earthlink.net>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 10:28:28 -0400
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
--==_Exmh_1398695308_205477P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Mon, 28 Apr 2014 07:08:55 -0700, TGLASSEY said:
> 1) The pipe issue is that of the last mile providers and not
> Netflix. The issue is the failure of the IETF to put controls in place
> which address this.
It's totally unclear to me that the IETF is the one who failed to put
controls in place. If they were able to mandate anything, BCP38 wouldn't
be an issue.
--==_Exmh_1398695308_205477P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001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=os5T
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1398695308_205477P--
