[170909] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: responding to DMARC breakage
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Sat Apr 12 12:50:12 2014
To: Miles Fidelman <mfidelman@meetinghouse.net>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 12 Apr 2014 10:12:09 -0400."
<534949B9.1080704@meetinghouse.net>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2014 12:49:04 -0400
Cc: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
--==_Exmh_1397321344_1587P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Sat, 12 Apr 2014 10:12:09 -0400, Miles Fidelman said:
> It occurs to me that Yahoo's deployment of DMARC p=reject, and the
> choice of several big mail operators to honor that, has created a
> situation not unlike a really routing table or nameserver, snafu ---
It's more like a peering war. Time for somebody to either bake a cake,
or find alternate transit providers.
--==_Exmh_1397321344_1587P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001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=e68e
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1397321344_1587P--
