[170908] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: responding to DMARC breakage
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (William Herrin)
Sat Apr 12 10:30:45 2014
In-Reply-To: <534949B9.1080704@meetinghouse.net>
From: William Herrin <bill@herrin.us>
Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2014 10:29:59 -0400
To: Miles Fidelman <mfidelman@meetinghouse.net>
Cc: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 10:12 AM, Miles Fidelman
<mfidelman@meetinghouse.net> wrote:
> What kind of responses are available? In the broader scope of things, what
> kinds of responses are typical if someone publishes corrupted information
> and then doesn't cooperate in fixing the situation - be that through
> obliviousness, incompetence, lack of resources, laziness, or active intent
> (criminal or not)?
1. Treat DMARC records which break mailing lists as malformed.
2. Treat messages with malformed DMARC records as a validation failure
and act as directed for validation failures.
-Bill
--
William D. Herrin ................ herrin@dirtside.com bill@herrin.us
3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/>
Falls Church, VA 22042-3004
