[170534] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: why IPv6 isn't ready for prime time, SMTP edition
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (=?utf-8?B?TcOlbnM=?= Nilsson)
Sat Mar 29 03:15:33 2014
Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2014 08:15:08 +0100
From: =?utf-8?B?TcOlbnM=?= Nilsson <mansaxel@besserwisser.org>
To: "John R. Levine" <johnl@iecc.com>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1403271032000.20076@joyce.lan>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
--k1BdFSKqAqVdu8k/
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: why IPv6 isn't ready for prime time, SMTP edition Date: Thu, M=
ar 27, 2014 at 10:32:42AM -0400 Quoting John R. Levine (johnl@iecc.com):
> >Ergo, ad hominem. Please quit doing that.
> >As a side note I happen to run my own mail server without spam filters
> >-- it works for me. I might not be the norm, but then again, is there
> >really a norm? (A norm that transcends SMTP RFC reach, that is --
>=20
> I know a lot of people who run a lot of mail systems, and let's just
> say you're so far out in the long tail we need a telescope to see
> you.
I will not debate with people who resort to humiliation techniques
when questioned.
<PLONK>
--=20
M=C3=A5ns Nilsson primary/secondary/besserwisser/machina
MN-1334-RIPE +46 705 989668
I feel like a wet parking meter on Darvon!
--k1BdFSKqAqVdu8k/
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAlM2cvwACgkQ02/pMZDM1cVM7wCfYwczQBqHCEnv0LcfLLhf9JZD
ArMAn2GaKXvmr5d0d0cUXYvRpzGZtbEc
=dEUx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--k1BdFSKqAqVdu8k/--
