[170526] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: ARIN board accountability to network operators
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Randy Bush)
Fri Mar 28 18:14:23 2014
Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2014 07:13:48 +0900
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>
In-Reply-To: <5335851C.1010102@foobar.org>
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
>> Yeah, RIPE NCC is definitely much cheaper for PI: no initial
>> registration fee of =E2=89=A5$500. The maintenance cost is $100/year vs
>> =E2=82=AC100/year (=C2=B1$137) so there is a little difference there. Th=
e $37
> =E2=82=AC50 per PI assignment from the ripe ncc, no?
> http://www.ripe.net/ripe/docs/ripe-591
guys, you are following an arin policy weenie's red herring. this was
not about fees. it was about arin's board being it's own governance
review committee and having no term limits, arin forcing folk to sign
contracts with clauses saying arin can change the Ts&Cs unilaterally and
arbitrarily, ...
randy
