[170510] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: ARIN board accountability to network operators
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Sander Steffann)
Fri Mar 28 11:21:26 2014
In-Reply-To: <5335851C.1010102@foobar.org>
From: Sander Steffann <sander@steffann.nl>
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2014 16:20:25 +0100
To: Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Oops. /me was confused. =E2=82=AC50 indeed!
Met vriendelijke groet,
Sander Steffann
> Op 28 mrt. 2014 om 15:20 heeft Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org> het volgend=
e geschreven:
>=20
>> On 28/03/2014 14:03, Sander Steffann wrote:
>> Yeah, RIPE NCC is definitely much cheaper for PI: no initial
>> registration fee of =E2=89=A5$500. The maintenance cost is $100/year vs
>> =E2=82=AC100/year (=C2=B1$137) so there is a little difference there. The=
$37
>=20
> =E2=82=AC50 per PI assignment from the ripe ncc, no?
>=20
> http://www.ripe.net/ripe/docs/ripe-591
>=20
> Nick
>=20
>=20
