[170481] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: ARIN board accountability to network operators (was: RE:

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (John Curran)
Thu Mar 27 22:17:22 2014

From: John Curran <jcurran@arin.net>
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2014 02:15:35 +0000
In-Reply-To: <m2vbuzfell.wl%randy@psg.com>
Cc: North American Network Operators' Group <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org

On Mar 28, 2014, at 6:42 AM, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> wrote:
> ...
> i purposefully phrased it a bit differently, how can arin engage, get
> real participation from, and serve its community, the operators.  i was
> stealing examples from ripe.
>=20
> but, for concrete action, how about a half day session at the next nanog
> meeting on, for example, arin database services, whois and irr.  not to
> try to reach hard conclusions or plans.  but to open a dialog to explore
> what the community gets and wants from these services and how they are
> provided.

My earlier message was sent before I saw this, but I think we converged=20
on the important point: ARIN needs to engage in a much better manner with=20
the ops community (more than just an ARIN update preso and registration=20
helpdesk); this should be closer to a "services wg" model.

Got it,
/John

John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN







home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post