[170480] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: ARIN board accountability to network operators (was: RE:
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Majdi S. Abbas)
Thu Mar 27 22:13:13 2014
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2014 22:12:53 -0400
From: "Majdi S. Abbas" <msa@latt.net>
To: John Curran <jcurran@arin.net>
In-Reply-To: <EB94621A-C271-428C-A7BF-E0EEBDA3BFE5@arin.net>
Cc: North American Network Operators' Group <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 02:04:30AM +0000, John Curran wrote:
> Internet routing registries are a fine example; one could argue that
> it should be integrated with the number resource registry, but we also
> have examples of independent routing registries in active use (and I
> can see some potential reasons why operators might even want there to
> be a healthy separation between those functions.)
Speaking for myself, only here:
I'll be happy to let ARIN manage routability of assignments,
once they guarantee routability of said assignments.
Cheers,
--msa
